Purpose: The flourishing of Political parties and currents is one of the signs of the degree of development in societies. In contemporary Iran and since the formation of the constitutional movement, Political currents have gone through many ups and downs and it can be said that Political currents in Iran after the Islamic Revolution have not yet reached the stage of institutionalization and stability. A characteristic feature of Political currents in Iran is the divergence and division among Political currents in recent decades, and this can be one of the reasons for the instability and cross-sectional and seasonal activity of Political parties in Iran. Therefore, the necessity of leading research seeks to answer the question of how factors and divergence among Political currents in Iran after the victory of the Islamic Revolution can be analyzed? And what are the scenarios for the advancement of Political currents in Iran?Method: To answer this question, the method of causal-layer Analysis, which is one of the qualitative methods in futures research, has been used.Findings: The research findings indicate that this divergence is due to a wide range of reasons from the level of causal systems (from the institutionalization of power to the formation of parties as elitist initiatives), worldview and Discourse (from charismatic Political authority to culture). Subsidiary-follower politics to myth-metaphor (Iranian individualism to belief in a strong state-weak society) can be analyzed.Conclusions: Three scenarios for the future of Iranian Political currents can be considered: integration of currents as the security valve of the Political system, the collapse of Political currents in the traditional form, integration and consolidation in new social movements (virtualized parties).

Our Analysis of Popper’s philosophy of science focuses on his concepts of tradition and situational Analysis. These concepts represent innovative Popperian contributions to a historical and hermeneutical turn in philosophy of science that most of his critics, especially Kuhn, fail to recognize. According to his historical view, Popper conceives sciences as a complex of traditions in continuous transformation and progress by means of rational discussion of theories. In order to grasp the rational progress of scientific traditions, Popper proposes an original method that he calls “situational Analysis”. This hermeneutical method seeks to understand the concepts, hypotheses, actions, practices, controversies and products that scientists made to solve problems in their specific historical contexts to improve the truth content of theories. In addition to his historical and hermeneutical turn, Popper also inquired about the social and Political conditions for the progress of scientific traditions by means of intersubjective criticism of theories and conjectures. According to him, the rational discussion of ideas requires, as necessary conditions, plurality of ideas, intellectual humility, and freedom of thought and communication that can only exist in an open and democratic society. With these considerations, we may say that in addition to a historical and hermeneutical turn, Popper also contributed to a social and Political turn in the philosophy of science

The main concern of the Political philosophy throughout history has been to meet the needs of the most important human issues like prosperity and human happiness.In fact, the fundamental goal of Political philosophy has been to remove the obstacles in the way of man’s most important challenges in both public and Political arenas including the nature of justice, the definition of prosperity and government's role in the materialization of the most important human needs where the realization of these issues and goals would be possible with regard to ethics. That’s why Political philosophers have paid special attention to the ethics and how it has been realized in community from past to the present. But the response and reaction of the philosophers to this important issue has been according to the circumstances of time and place and this is while we witness the increase of the moral and identity challenges at both domestic and global levels in information age and increased attention to the ethics in Political philosophy at both individual and social domains as well.It can be said that the formulation of the basic nature and the purpose of western Political schools and philosophers such as socialists, those trust-minded, traditionalists, relativists, and identity minded people and thinkers such as Taylor, Fukuyama, and Niebuhr and Paul Tillich revolve around ethics. In other words, ethics forms the cornerstone of Political philosophy at the age of globalization in all aspects particularly when it comes to fundamental questions such as the ultimate goal of mankind, states and the functions of governments. Even some features of the Political philosophy at the age of information explosion such as lack of idealism and decline in the literature of Political philosophy are influenced by this important aspect.

Political novel is one of the kinds of Persian Literature with special factors, which are different from other contemporary story writing styles. These types of stories are more accommodated with criti-cal Discourse Analysis (CDA) among other methods of novel analyses compared to other types, because of their specificity and unique quality of and their close relations with society and Political events. One of the approaches used in surveying these types of stories is the use of the framework of text and met text with the best and the most effective approach, i.e. that of Norman Fairclough who surveys a text in three levels of description, interpretation, and exploration. It has to be mentioned that the novel of “Unsecured Existence” written by Afshin-e Khorram is one of the Political novels written after the Islamic Revolu-tion. The writer tries to survey, interpret, and criticize the main and influential Political events of Iran with emphasis on the psychological issues of the characters on the basis of CDA and to present the pro-jected elements like semiotics of the elements like, Subject, Pictures and Descriptions of the characters of the story, the Narration procedure, Plot, and the Theme of the story.

Bridging among linguistics, social and Political sciences, Discourse Analysis opened up a new horizon to literature. Some theories lean to linguistics, some to social and Political sciences. The common idea among them, however, is to explore the socio-Political Discourses governing the text through exploring the signs. Mauffe and Laclao’s Discourse Analysis theory is based more on social and Political sciences and emphasizes the fluidity of sins. Adonis’s Discourse is constituted based on this fluidity, and that is why Mauffe and Laclao’s Discourse Analysis can prove helpful in studying these items of Discourse to achieve the socio-Political aims. This study concludes that Adonis's Discourse is a Discourse of change and reform, and seeks a struggle whose weapon is the power of language. He sees the Arab countries' way out of backwardness as re-reading the concepts of value because he believes that these concepts have historically been contaminated by what the regime has imposed on them. He also concludes that poetry, by persuading people in society to build a better society, turns them into revolutionary subjects. The research method is that different signs are extracted from the poem and in order to answer the research questions according to Laclau and Moff's Discourse Analysis system, which examines the relationship between signs and also between Discourses, analyzes the socio-Political impact of Adonis's Discourse. It becomes.

Introduction: Neurolinguistics is the science concerned with the neural mechanisms underlying the comprehension, production and abstract knowledge of language. Studies on language and communication Impairments after brain damage are perhaps the most common studies of this discipline. This study is concerned with the conversational cohesion patterns used by normal age Persian natives (NA) and those suffering from Alzheimer's disease (AD). Materials and Methods: Six Alzheimer’s patients participated in the research. The participants were matched for age, sex, and education to make six control subjects. Three main tasks were used to assess the impairments of cohesive ties in their Discourse: One task of spontaneous speech and two tasks of picture description.Results: NA subjects produced 2.27% structural cohesion ties in 443 sentences while AD subjects used 1.89% of these devices in 235 produced sentences. NA subjects produced .01% of structural cohesive errors whereas AD subjects made 1% errors, especially “exophoric referent errors”, while doing the tasks. As for lexical ties, ADs produced more repetitions (17%) than NAs (10%).Conclusion: The results reveal a significantly greater use of cohesion errors by AD subjects than NAs. The occurrence of cohesive errors alone isn’t a differential diagnosis of such a disease; however, such investigations could provide information for studies on neurological disorders and linguistic theories.

Contemporary approaches interpreted Political theory as ignoring Political reality, lacking a real problem and more subject of the abstract and metaphysical dignity. The research is opposed to this view and attempting to interpret Political theory as engaging in Political reality. For this purpose, this study intends to present a discursive conception of ancient Greek Political theory and its relationship with Political action - as a criterion of Political reality. For this reason, the writers, first of all, look at the genealogy of the conditions for the emergence of Political theory in ancient Greece.Then, by choosing the concept of polis as the central sign of ancient Greek Political theory, explaining the centrality of this concept. The following section attempts to reveal the relation of Discourse of the polis with the fundamental elements of the ancient Greek Political theory. The last issue is about the quality and the relationship between Political theory and Political action in ancient Greece. This research uses the assumptions of Discourse theory to support its claim.

After three decades of using the Discourse-based approach to carry out Political research in Iran, it seems necessary to do research on these research works. Therefore, this study asks what inclinations are reflected in both the theoretical framework and the content of Discourse-based pieces of research in Iran and what the shortcomings and challenges are. In order to answer this question, this article has sought to present the theoretical inclinations, variety of subjects, and the dominant themes in Iranian research works through a meta-Analysis of a sample size of 201 pieces of Discourse-based Political research. The findings of the article show that these research works have shortcomings and face challenges at two levels, namely the extent to which they conform to the rules of the Discourse-based approach and criticisms of this approach at the international level.

The assassination of General Qassem Soleimani became an event for the convergence of Political currents inside Iran, as well as the focus of Islamic currents in the Middle East on the issue of terrorism and fighting the hegemony of foreign countries in the region.The prominent features of military command, Political tact and charismatic personality are important components that made him superior to other senior military commanders of Iran. For this reason, after his martyrdom and the publication of his will as a coherent writing containing Political, religious, religious and social opinions and thoughts, this question arose for the researchers that in the absence and vacuum of research on Sardar Soleimani's thought, which is the novelty of the current research. highlights, what Political Discourse does his will represent as an authentic document to the survivors?This research is of an applied type that by adopting the questioning strategy, it has analyzed the qualitative method of analyzing the Discourse of Norman Fairclough, focusing on the writing of Sardar Soleimani's will.In the findings of the research, the elements of entitlement, expediency, oppression, religious authority, Shiaism, faithism, unificationism, deificationism, responsibility, anti-corruptionism, fundamentalism, sociability, description and then these elements are analyzed and interpreted step by step. became.In the general conclusion, it was found that Sardar Soleimani's Political Discourse, as a sub-Discourse, has the necessary capacity to support the theory of Ayatollah Khamenei's revolutionary system and represent the Discourse of Political Islam.